Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-06-12 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 14.04 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 406 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P90 MT6779V (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 10380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 10.48 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is much better than Blackview BV8900, having a global score of 90.8 against 73.1. The Galaxy Note 20 is an a lot older phone than the Blackview BV8900, but Samsung was able to build it notably lighter and incredibly thinner anyway. Blackview BV8900 counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels quantity in each inch of screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2408px.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Blackview BV8900. They have a 8 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores. The Blackview BV8900 has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1 TB and more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a greater camera than Blackview BV8900, although it has a much worse 12 MP resolution back facing camera. Blackview BV8900 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has 10380mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.