Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-06-12 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 14.04 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 406 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P90 MT6779V (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 10380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 10.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Blackview BV8900, getting a 98.9 score against 73.1. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is an incredibly older phone than the Blackview BV8900, but it's incredibly thinner and lighter anyway. These phones use the same Android 13 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit faster CPU than Blackview BV8900, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a slightly better looking display than Blackview BV8900, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a little bit bigger screen and a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Blackview BV8900 features a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. The Blackview BV8900 has a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 10380mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Blackview BV8900, because it has a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.