Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-06-12 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 14.04 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 406 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P90 MT6779V (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 10380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 10.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 is just a bit better than Blackview BV8900, having an 80.2 score against 73.1. The Galaxy Note5 is an noticeably older phone than Blackview BV8900, but Samsung managed to build it lighter and incredibly thinner. The Blackview BV8900 has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Blackview BV8900 also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note5 features a bit more vivid display than Blackview BV8900, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Blackview BV8900 has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note5, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 256 GB internal storage.
Galaxy Note5 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Blackview BV8900, although it has a lot worse resolution camera. Blackview BV8900 features a way better battery life than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 246% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.