Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-06-12 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 14.04 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 406 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P90 MT6779V (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 10380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 10.48 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is much better than the Blackview BV8900's 73.1 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy S10e is an older cellphone than Blackview BV8900, but Samsung was able to build it lighter and thinner. Blackview BV8900 has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2408 pixels resolution and a bit larger screen.
The Blackview BV8900 counts with a superior memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 256 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S10e features just a bit better processing power than Blackview BV8900, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Blackview BV8900 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 10380mAh battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a better camera than Blackview BV8900, although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower 12 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.