Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-06-12 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 14.04 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 406 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P90 MT6779V (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 10380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 10.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is way better than the Blackview BV8900, with a score of 88.5 against 73.1. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has older 12 version and Blackview BV8900 has Android 13. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip body is thinner and incredibly lighter than the Blackview BV8900, although it was released 3 years before.
The Blackview BV8900 has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little smaller display, a bit worse 1080 x 2408 resolution and a little bit less pixels per inch of display. The Blackview BV8900 counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Blackview BV8900 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy Z Flip has a bit superior processing unit than Blackview BV8900. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip shoots much clearer photos and videos than Blackview BV8900, although it has a way worse resolution back camera. Blackview BV8900 has a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 10380mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.