Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-06-12 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 14.04 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 406 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P90 MT6779V (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 10380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 10.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way better than the Blackview BV8900, having a 92.3 score against 73.1. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is an noticeably older phone than the Blackview BV8900, but Samsung was able to make it extremely thinner and extremely lighter. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has older 11 version and Blackview BV8900 has Android 13.
Blackview BV8900 has a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2408 resolution, a little bit smaller display and a just a bit worse display pixel density. The Blackview BV8900 features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Blackview BV8900 also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little bit better performance than Blackview BV8900. They have 8 GB of RAM memory and 8 processing cores. The Blackview BV8900 has a much better battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 10380mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a superior camera than Blackview BV8900, although it has a lot lower 12 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.