Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-06-12 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 14.04 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 406 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P90 MT6779V (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 10380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 10.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than Blackview BV8900's overall score of 73.1. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version and Blackview BV8900 has Android 13. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot older than Blackview BV8900, it's body is incredibly lighter and notably thinner.
Blackview BV8900 has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2408 pixels resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher screen density. The Blackview BV8900 counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same 256 GB internal memory capacity, the Blackview BV8900 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit superior CPU than Blackview BV8900, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a greater camera than Blackview BV8900, although it has a lot worse 12 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Blackview BV8900 counts with a superior battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 10380mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.