Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 2023-06-12 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 14.04 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 406 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P90 MT6779V (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 10380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 10.48 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a global score of 87.9, which is much better than the Blackview BV8900's 73.1 global score. Even though Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much older than the Blackview BV8900, it's body is way lighter and notably thinner. Both devices in this review include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the previous 10 version and Blackview BV8900 has Android 13.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit sharper display than Blackview BV8900, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit worse quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a lot brighter display and a quite larger display. Blackview BV8900 counts with a much greater storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features just a little better hardware performance than Blackview BV8900, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Blackview BV8900 has a very superior battery duration than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 10380mAh battery size. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures way better photos and videos than Blackview BV8900. They have the same resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.