Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 2023-06-12 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 14.04 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 406 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P90 MT6779V (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 10380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 10.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a global score of 81.1, which is much better than Blackview BV8900's 73.1 global score. Both phones in this review have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an older 10 version and Blackview BV8900 has Android 13. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is an much older phone than Blackview BV8900, but it is extremely lighter and notably thinner anyway.
Blackview BV8900 features a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2408px and a just a bit better pixels density. Blackview BV8900 features much more memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB and 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a little faster processing unit than Blackview BV8900, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Blackview BV8900 has a way better battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a 107 percent bigger battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Blackview BV8900. Both of them have a 64 megapixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.