Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-06-12 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 14.04 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 406 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P90 MT6779V (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 10380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 10.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is just a bit better than Blackview BV8900, getting a global score of 79 against 73.1. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has the older 11 version and Blackview BV8900 has Android 13 version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S construction is noticeably thinner and noticeably lighter than Blackview BV8900, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before.
The Blackview BV8900 counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2408px. Blackview BV8900 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S count with really similar processors, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Blackview BV8900, although it has a lot less MP resolution camera. The Blackview BV8900 features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB.
Blackview BV8900 has a much better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has 10380mAh of battery capacity against 5020mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.