Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 13 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| -- | 2020-04-24 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Red and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone SE (2020) has a score of 81.5, which is better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12's overall score of 71.5. Apple iPhone SE (2020) counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 works with Android 13 operating system. Apple iPhone SE (2020) is a thinner and lighter phone than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12.
Apple iPhone SE (2020) features a quite better hardware performance than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has an incredibly better screen than iPhone SE (2020), because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2460 resolution, a really brighter screen, a bit higher pixels density and a lot bigger screen.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than iPhone SE (2020), because it has an external memory slot that holds up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The iPhone SE (2020) captures much clearer photos and videos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a camera with a way lower 12 MP resolution.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a really longer battery life than iPhone SE (2020), because it has a 175 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.