Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is a lot better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, having a general score of 88.1 against 71.5. The iPhone X is a a bit thinner and somewhat lighter phone than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a much better screen than iPhone X, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a just a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a larger display and way more display brightness.
IPhone X features a bit superior processor than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and 2 less cpu cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a bigger storage to store more games and applications than iPhone X, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Apple iPhone X features a superior camera than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a much worse resolution camera in the back. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a much longer battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.