Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has an overall score of 89, which is way better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12's 71.5 global score. Google Pixel 5's construction is a little thinner and much lighter than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a little bit better processing power than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. They have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a much sharper display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a bit worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px. The Google Pixel 5 features a much better camera than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a back camera with a much lower 12.2 megapixels resolution.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a much greater memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 23% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.