Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 13 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8 ThinQ has an overall score of 84.3, which is much better than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12's 71.5 overall score. The LG G8 ThinQ is a lighter device than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, but they have the same thickness. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but LG G8 ThinQ has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13, so it gives some extra features and performance enhancements.
LG G8 ThinQ features a bit faster processor than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a more vivid screen than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a way worse pixel number per inch in the screen and a way worse 1080 x 2460 resolution, it also counts with much more brightness and a quite bigger screen.
LG G8 ThinQ has a better camera than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a camera in the back with a lot worse 12 megapixels resolution. LG G8 ThinQ features a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a superior battery life than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.