Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, getting a general score of 81.3 against 71.5. LG V35 ThinQ is a incredibly lighter and thinner cellphone than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a much more vibrant display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a way worse screen density and a much lower 1080 x 2460 resolution, it also counts with a little bit larger screen. The LG V35 ThinQ shoots much clearer photos and videos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a back facing camera with a way worse 16 megapixels resolution.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a really longer battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.