Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is much better than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, with a score of 87.1 against 71.5. The LG Velvet is a a little lighter and just a little thinner phone than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. LG Velvet counts with a little better performance than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a way better looking display than LG Velvet. They have the same pixel density, a display of the same size and the same resolution of 1080 x 2460. The LG Velvet has a quite bigger memory to store more games and applications than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG Velvet also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has longer battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The LG Velvet captures much better photographs and videos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a camera with much less mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.