Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A31 has a general score of 81.3, which is better than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12's score of 71.5. The Samsung Galaxy A31 is a a bit lighter but just a bit thicker device than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. Both devices in our current comparison use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A31 has the previous 10 version while Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A31, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A31, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px.
Galaxy A31 has a much better camera than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a back camera with a way worse 48 megapixels resolution. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a much greater storage for apps and games than Galaxy A31, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 and Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 feature extremely similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.