Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G has a score of 79.4, which is much better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12's score of 71.5. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A35 5G has newer 14 version while Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13, counting with a couple additional features and some performance improvements. The Galaxy A35 5G construction is just a little bit thinner but just a little heavier than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a way better display than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has a little greater pixel density, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels, a lot brighter display and a bit bigger display. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has an extremely better CPU than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a battery life that's just as good as the battery lifetime in Blackview Oscal Tiger 12.
Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much better camera than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a camera with much less mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.