Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A40 is better than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, having a 79.6 score against 71.5. Samsung Galaxy A40's body is a little bit thinner and a lot lighter than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A40 has an older 11 version and Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13 version.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a lot better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a quite lower count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a bigger display.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A40, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Galaxy A40 features a bit better camera than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a way worse 16 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.