Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is way better than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, having a 90.8 score against 71.5. These phones have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has an older 11 version while Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G body is a little lighter but a little thicker than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a way better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little worse pixels quantity in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a little larger screen. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a processor that is very similar to the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 one, and although the Galaxy A51 5G has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Galaxy A51 5G shoots much clearer photos and videos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a back camera with much less mega-pixels resolution. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a slightly bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.