Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 is much better than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, getting a overall score of 87.5 against 71.5. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 has older 11 version and Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13. Samsung Galaxy A71's design is a little thinner and just a little lighter than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a much better looking display than Galaxy A71, because it has a little bigger display, a just a bit better pixels density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2460 resolution. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a slightly bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A71, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A71's processor is just as good as the CPU in Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, and although the Galaxy A71 has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a little longer battery life than Galaxy A71, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity.
The Galaxy A71 shoots way better photos and videos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. Both have the same resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.