Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) has a score of 85.2, which is much better than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12's score of 71.5. Galaxy A9 (2018)'s design is a little thinner and a bit lighter than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features a processor that's just as good as the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 one, and although the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a bit better display pixel density, a bit bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) takes greater pictures and videos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower resolution. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has improved battery life than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.