Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, with a score of 98.9 against 71.5. These phones work with the same Android 13 OS. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's construction is a little bit heavier but just a bit thinner than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit more powerful processor than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features an incredibly better screen than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a little lower pixels density, a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a little bit smaller display. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes way better videos and photos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, because it has a back camera with way more megapixels.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a slightly better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a little better battery performance than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.