Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is much better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, getting an 81.2 score against 71.5. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 construction has the same thickness than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, but it is somewhat lighter. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the previous 5.0 version while Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a CPU that's just as good as the processor in Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, because although the Galaxy Note 3 has lesser processing cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional GPU. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a much better looking display than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a larger screen, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels and a quite higher pixel density.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB and more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 takes much better photos and videos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a much less mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.