| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 5.0, 4.4 |
| -- | 2014-09-03 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 269.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.6 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (825 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 20 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
The Galaxy Note 4 has a general score of 81.6, which is much better than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12's overall score of 71.5. Galaxy Note 4 is a somewhat lighter phone than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, but both of them have the same thickness. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 4 has older 5.0 version while Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 4 features a bit faster processor than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, because although it has less cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a GPU. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note 4, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2460px resolution and a just a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a bigger screen.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 4, because it has more internal memory and a SD card slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 4 has a better camera than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a way less megapixels back camera.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a very superior battery performance than Galaxy Note 4, because it has a 55 percent more battery capacity.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.