Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is a lot better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, having a overall score of 89 against 71.5. The Galaxy Note10 construction is a bit thinner and lighter than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a bit superior CPU than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. They have 8 cpu cores and a 8 GB RAM.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a lot better looking display than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a just a little lower screen density, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2460px resolution and a quite bigger display. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a camera in the back with lot less mega-pixels. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.