Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is way better than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, having a 93.6 score against 71.5. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has an older 11 version and Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a just a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter phone than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a way better looking display than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels and a just a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit larger screen. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has more memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little faster processing unit than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. Both have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM. The Galaxy S10 5G captures much clearer videos and photos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a camera with a lot worse 12 mega-pixels resolution.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.