Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12 |
| -- | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, getting a score of 95.4 against 71.5. Both of these phones come with the same Android 13 OS (Operating System). The Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is just a bit thicker and heavier than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little bit better performance than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. They have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has a much lower 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution and a just a little less pixels per inch of screen, and they both have a display with the same size, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also counts with a really brighter screen.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra takes greater pictures and videos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, because it has a lot better 108 mega pixels resolution back camera. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's battery lifetime is very similar to the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.