Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S5
32 GBSM-G901F
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 4.4.2 |
| -- | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Blue, Gold, Red and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S5 has a general score of 80.8, which is much better than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12's 71.5 score. The Galaxy S5 design is just a little thinner and lighter than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S5 has a newer 4.4.2 version and Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13, offering some extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 features a bit more powerful processor than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a graphics co-processor. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy S5, because although it has way less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a way larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2460 resolution.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5, because it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a superior battery life than Galaxy S5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
The Galaxy S5 has a superior camera than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a way worse 16 megapixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.