Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 4.4.2 |
| -- | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Blue and Red |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.6 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a score of 77.8, which is a bit better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12's score of 71.5. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has newer 4.4.2 version while Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13, so it provides the user a lot of extra features and optimized performance. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is a notably lighter but just a little bit thicker device than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a little bit better processing power than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an extra GPU. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a little lower display density, it also counts with a way larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2460 resolution.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a very superior memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport shoots much better photographs and videos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a back-facing camera with much less mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.