Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 edge is a bit better than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, with a 78.1 score against 71.5. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S7 edge has 8.0 Oreo version while Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13. The Galaxy S7 edge construction is a bit thinner and noticeably lighter than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution and a way lower pixel density, it also counts with a bigger display. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has more 2.2 gigahertz CPU cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S7 edge shoots better videos and photos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a back camera with a much worse 12 megapixels resolution.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.