Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Gold and Gray |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is better than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, getting an 81.9 score against 71.5. Although it's the best we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy S8 Active's body is just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. The Galaxy S8 Active and Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 count with extremely similar processors, and although the Galaxy S8 Active has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a way worse display density and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2460, it also counts with a larger screen. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has greater battery performance than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active shoots better videos and photos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a back facing camera with lot less MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.