Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is way better than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, getting a general score of 88.5 against 71.5. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip has older 12 version and Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. Galaxy Z Flip's body is just a bit lighter and thinner than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a much sharper screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a little worse pixel number per screen inch, it also counts with a bit larger screen. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1 TB.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better performance than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. They have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a better camera than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a lot less MP back-facing camera. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.