Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, having a global score of 92.3 against 71.5. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version and Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's design is just a little lighter and thinner than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit more powerful processor than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. They have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a way better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2460 resolution and a just a bit inferior pixel amount per inch of display, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a better memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a superior camera than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a lot less mega pixels camera in the back.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.