Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 13 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Compact is much better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, getting a 79 score against 71.5. The Xperia XZ2 Compact design is somewhat lighter but incredibly thicker than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. Both devices in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xperia XZ2 Compact has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13 version, so it counts with a couple nice extra features.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a sharper display than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels, a lot bigger screen and a way brighter screen. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features a bit more powerful processor than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Xperia XZ2 Compact takes way better photos and videos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a camera in the back with a way worse resolution.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a much better battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.