Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ2 Premium has a general score of 82.2, which is better than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12's 71.5 overall score. Despite being the best in this comparison review, Xperia XZ2 Premium is a somewhat heavier and much thicker phone than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium features a bit superior processor than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a little bit better screen than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because although it has a much lower amount of pixels per inch of display and a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2460px, it also counts with a really brighter display and a bigger display. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a much better storage to store more games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a really longer battery duration than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 41 percent greater battery size. Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a much better camera than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a camera in the back with a way lower resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.