Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 13 | Android 5.1 |
| -- | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia Z4v has a score of 78.8, which is better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12's 71.5 general score. These phones use Android OS, but the Sony Xperia Z4v has the previous 5.1 version and Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. The Sony Xperia Z4v is a somewhat lighter but a bit thicker cellphone than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12.
Xperia Z4v counts with a bit faster CPU than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xperia Z4v also counts with a GPU. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a bit better display than Xperia Z4v, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution and a way lower number of pixels in each inch of screen, it also counts with a much bigger display.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Xperia Z4v, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 96 GB more internal memory. Xperia Z4v captures greater photographs and videos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a back facing camera with a way lower resolution.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a very superior battery life than Xperia Z4v, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.