Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-11-20 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Aurora green, Glacier white and Midnight black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 13.09 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 is much better than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, having an 83.7 score against 71.5. Although it's the best in this comparison review, Xiaomi Mi Note 10 is a a little heavier and thicker phone than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has an older 10 version and Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a much more vibrant screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, because although it has a just a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bit bigger display, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels and a much brighter screen. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has a processor that is very similar to the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 one, and although the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 takes much better pictures and videos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, because it has a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 counts with a little better battery life than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, because it has a 5260mAh battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.