Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much better than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, with an 87.9 score against 71.5. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has 10 version while Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a just a little thicker and just a little bit heavier cellphone than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a much better screen than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a little bit higher pixels density, a slightly higher 1080 x 2460 resolution, a bit bigger screen and a way brighter display. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little bit better performance than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a little longer battery duration than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 6% greater battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a greater camera than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. Both have a same resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.