Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is much better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, with a overall score of 79 against 71.5. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S body is a little heavier and a little bit thicker than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. Both devices we compare here work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has older 11 version while Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a CPU that's very similar to the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 one, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a way better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a quite larger screen, a little bit more pixels per display inch and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a very superior memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S shoots way better pictures and videos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a back facing camera with way less mega-pixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a battery life that is very similar to the battery duration in Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a 5020mAh battery size against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.