Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 20 has a global score of 77.8, which is a bit better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12's 71.5 overall score. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but the ZTE Axon 20 has the older 10 version while Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13. The ZTE Axon 20 body is just a bit thinner and just a bit lighter than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12.
ZTE Axon 20 features a bit better processing unit than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a much more vibrant screen than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2460px, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also counts with a quite higher pixel count per screen inch.
ZTE Axon 20 counts with a much better camera than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. Both have the same resolution back camera. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than ZTE Axon 20, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features superior battery lifetime than ZTE Axon 20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.