| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.70 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Aqua and Black |
| -- | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 32000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 13.59 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| 8.69 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | -- |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
ZTE Axon 30 5G is better than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, getting a overall score of 79.9 against 71.5. Both devices in our current comparison use Android operating system, but ZTE Axon 30 5G has the previous 11 version and Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13. The ZTE Axon 30 5G is a a little lighter and just a little thinner cellphone than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a slightly better looking display than ZTE Axon 30 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2460px, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also counts with a bit higher pixel count in each display inch. ZTE Axon 30 5G counts with a much better performance than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than ZTE Axon 30 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1 TB. The ZTE Axon 30 5G's camera is just as good as Blackview Oscal Tiger 12's camera, both have a camera with a 64 megapixels resolution.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a little longer battery performance than ZTE Axon 30 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.