Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 35.00mm focal length |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has an overall score of 78.1, which is just a bit better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12's score of 71.5. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is a a little bit thinner and just a little lighter cellphone than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. Both devices we compare here use Android operating system, but ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has the previous 11 version and Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13 version.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processor. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a much sharper screen than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has a quite bigger screen, a little bit better pixel quantity per screen inch and a little bit higher 1080 x 2460px resolution.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with just a bit better battery performance than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has a 9 percent larger battery capacity.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra captures a lot better photos and videos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. Both have a back-facing camera with a 64 megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.