Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-09 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.25 x 2.92 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Raven black | Black and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is way better than the BLU Bold N1, getting an 81.3 score against 67.4. The LG V35 ThinQ design is somewhat lighter and thinner than the BLU Bold N1, even though it was released a bit more over a year before. The LG V35 ThinQ features a little faster CPU than BLU Bold N1, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better looking display than BLU Bold N1, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than BLU Bold N1, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
BLU Bold N1 features a bit superior battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 6% larger battery capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better camera than BLU Bold N1, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor which gives a lower image and video quality, and they both have a camera with a 16 MP resolution, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and video.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more than BLU Bold N1, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.