Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.4 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-09 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.25 x 2.92 x 0.34 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Raven black | Gold and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is a lot better than the BLU Bold N1, with an 81.9 score against 67.4. Although the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is a better cellphone than the BLU Bold N1, it must be noted that it's also a notably older, heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone. Galaxy S8 Active has a little more vivid display than BLU Bold N1, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active counts with a little better processing power than BLU Bold N1. Both have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The BLU Bold N1 has a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 128 GB against 256 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active features a bit better camera than BLU Bold N1, because although it has a way less MP back-facing camera, it also counts with a way better (4K) video definition, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and video and a bigger back camera sensor which offers a better image and video quality.
Galaxy S8 Active counts with a little better battery life than BLU Bold N1, because it has a 14% greater battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest one, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.