Search


Compare phones

Global Score
26.539
Basic Information
BLUNokia
--Symbian 9.4
--2010-08-24
1.75 x 4.04 x 0.59 inches4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches
--3.77 ounces
--Blue, Gray, Purple, Red and White
$ 60.00$ 59.00
Display / Screen
1.8 inches2.8 inches
128 x 128 pixels 360 x 640 pixels
CSTNTFT
101 pixels per inch262 pixels per inch
No touch screenResistive
57.2
processorARM11 (Single-Core 434 MHz) processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.48
Storage
--52,22 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot
01.4
Camera
0.10 MP2.00 MP
--640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution
3.085.28
GPRS and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIM, Dual SIMSIM
0.20.3
Battery Life
500mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
--450 hours standby time
7.7 hours talk time
1.682.56
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
--Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

The Nokia 5250 is a lot better than the BLU CLICK, having a 39 score against 26.5. Nokia 5250 has a quite better performance than BLU CLICK, because it has a larger number of faster cores. Nokia 5250 features a way better looking screen than BLU CLICK, because it has a lot higher 640 x 360 pixels resolution, way more pixels per inch of display and a much bigger screen.

Nokia 5250 features a much better camera than BLU CLICK, because it has a camera with way more megapixels. The Nokia 5250 has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than BLU CLICK. Nokia 5250 counts with a superior battery lifetime than BLU CLICK, because it has 1000mAh of battery capacity.

Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Nokia 5250 is also the cheapest one, which makes it easy to pick between these phones.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.