Search


Compare phones

Global Score
29.139
Basic Information
BLUNokia
--Symbian 9.4
--2010-08-24
4.29 x 1.81 x 0.53 inches4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches
--3.77 ounces
--Blue, Gray, Purple, Red and White
$ 60.00$ 59.00
Display / Screen
2 inches2.8 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)360 x 640 pixels
--TFT
200 pixels per inch262 pixels per inch
No touch screenResistive
6.27.2
processorARM11 (Single-Core 434 MHz) processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.48
Storage
--52,22 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 8 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot
0.761.4
Camera
0.30 MP2.00 MP
--640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution
3.635.28
UMTS, GPRS and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.20.3
Battery Life
800mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
--450 hours standby time
7.7 hours talk time
2.242.56
Other Features
BluetoothBluetooth 2.0, EDR
--Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor
FM Radio--

Comparison review

The Nokia 5250 has a score of 39, which is much better than the BLU Flash's global score of 29.1. The Nokia 5250 counts with a more powerful processor than BLU Flash, because it has a larger number of cores. The Nokia 5250 counts with a brighter display than BLU Flash, because it has a way better 640 x 360 resolution, more pixels per inch of display and a really bigger screen.

Nokia 5250 features much more memory capacity for applications and games than BLU Flash, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 16 GB. Nokia 5250 counts with a lot better camera than BLU Flash, because it has a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels. Nokia 5250 features better battery lifetime than BLU Flash, because it has 1000mAh of battery capacity.

Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Nokia 5250 is also the cheapest one, making it easy to pick between these phones.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.