Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-27 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.18 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 209.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P60 MT6771 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is a lot better than BLU G9 Pro, with a global score of 81.2 against 67. These phones work with Android OS, but LG V40 ThinQ has older 10 version while BLU G9 Pro has Android 9.0 Pie. Even though the LG V40 ThinQ is older than the BLU G9 Pro, it's body is thinner and a bit lighter. LG V40 ThinQ features just a little better performance than BLU G9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a little bit better screen than BLU G9 Pro, because it has a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution, more pixels per inch of screen and a little larger display. LG V40 ThinQ has a much better camera than BLU G9 Pro, because although it has a way less MP back facing camera, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video definition, a larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and video.
LG V40 ThinQ has a little bit better storage for games and applications than BLU G9 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The BLU G9 Pro features superior battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
LG V40 ThinQ is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest one, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.