Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-27 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.18 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Glass and Metal | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 209.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P60 MT6771 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto Z2 Play has a score of 77.4, which is much better than BLU G9 Pro's 67 overall score. Even though Moto Z2 Play is much older than the BLU G9 Pro, it's construction is extremely thinner and noticeably lighter. BLU G9 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a little bigger display, a slightly higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little greater pixels density.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a bit superior processing unit than BLU G9 Pro. Both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM. Moto Z2 Play has a much better camera than BLU G9 Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot lower 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition and a larger aperture to capture better images and videos in low light environments.
Moto Z2 Play features a slightly bigger storage to store more apps and games than BLU G9 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The BLU G9 Pro features greater battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Moto Z2 Play not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.