Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-27 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.18 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 209.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P60 MT6771 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is a lot better than the BLU G9 Pro's global score of 67. The Galaxy A50 design is thinner and just a little bit lighter than BLU G9 Pro, even though they were only released with a couple of months difference. BLU G9 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A50 feature quite similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has a little inferior pixels quantity per display inch, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features a bit better processing unit than BLU G9 Pro. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount. The Galaxy A50 captures much better photographs and videos than BLU G9 Pro, and although they both have the same camera sensor size, the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A50 also has a way more MP back-facing camera and a larger aperture for better captures and videos in low light situations.
The BLU G9 Pro and the Galaxy A50 count with quite similar memory capacity for games and applications, both have a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB and exactly the same internal memory. The BLU G9 Pro and the Galaxy A50 feature very similar batteries performance.
The Galaxy A50 not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.